太极张三丰
Nivin Pauly Slams Producers’ Body Over 2025 Box Office List_我的网站
一 | The Kerala Film Producers’ Association recently released a list of Malayalam films that hit theatres in 2025, complete with their reported commercial performance. What was meant to be an industry update has quickly turned into a flashpoint, drawing sharp criticism from filmmakers, actors and audiences alike.A List That Sparked a StormOne of the earliest voices to question the list was Anuraj Manohar, director of Narivetta, which stars Tovino Thomas. The filmmaker took to social media asking why his film was missing from the document and demanded clarity on the criteria used to compile it. His post opened the floodgates, with netizens and industry insiders scrutinising the accuracy and intent behind the classification of films as superhits, hits or otherwise.The controversy only intensified when actor Nivin Pauly weighed in during a press conference held to promote his upcoming film Sarvam Maya. Addressing reporters, Nivin said that publishing such a list was unnecessary and unprecedented. According to him, cinema is a business like any other and every year will naturally see a mix of profit and loss. He argued that there was no reason to put those figures out in public, especially at a time when the Malayalam industry is trying to evolve and attract fresh investment. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Anuraj Radhamani Manohar (@anurajmanohar) Nivin added that making commercial verdicts public in this manner could do more harm than good, as it risks creating a negative perception among potential investors and partners. His statement has since been widely shared, with many agreeing that transparency should not come at the cost of damaging the ecosystem.Confusion Over Hits, Superhits and Missing FilmsAdding to the uproar is the way the association has categorised the year’s releases. Only a small number of films have been labelled as superhits and hits, leaving the majority outside these brackets. This has triggered heated online debates, especially over the classification of certain high-profile titles.A key point of contention is the treatment of Eko and Empuraan. Social media users are questioning why Eko has been listed merely as a hit even though it reportedly earned higher net profits than Empuraan, which the list describes as a superhit. For many, this discrepancy has raised doubts about whether the parameters used were consistent or even reliable. Equally puzzling is the absence of Sumathi Valavu from either the hit or superhit categories. The film enjoyed a healthy run in theatres and generated strong word of mouth, making its omission all the more glaring. Fans and trade observers have since demanded an explanation from the association, arguing that incomplete or selective reporting only erodes trust.The backlash has also revived a broader conversation about Nivin Pauly’s own recent career trajectory. While several of his films over the past few years have struggled at the box office, many of them have been critically appreciated. In this context, his comments are being read not as defensive but as a plea for a more nuanced understanding of success, one that goes beyond financial labels.As the debate rages on, the Kerala Film Producers’ Association has yet to issue a detailed clarification on how the list was prepared or why certain films were excluded. Until then, the document is likely to remain a sore point, serving as a reminder that in an industry built on collaboration, public scorecards can easily backfire.Also Read: Nivin Pauly, Mohanlal and Pranav Spark a Social Media Frenzy With Surprise Jet Photos。 제자를 성폭행한 혐의로 재판에 넘겨진 뮤지컬 배우 남경주 씨가 오는 11월 국민참여재판을 받는다.서울중앙지법 형사합의29부(엄기표 부장판사)는 26일 남씨의 피감독자간음 혐의 사건 첫 공판준비기일을 열고 "11월 27일과 30일 이틀간 국민참여재판을 진행하겠다"고 밝혔다.국민참여재판은 형사재판에 일반 국민이 배심원으로 참여해 피고인의 유무죄와 양형에 관한 의견을 제시하는 제도다. 배심원단 의견은 법적 구속력은 없고 권고적 효력만 갖는다.이번 국민참여재판은 남씨 측이 요청했다.남씨 측은 "피고인과 피해자 사이에 보호 감독 관계가 있었는지가 주된 쟁점"이라며 "피고인과 변호인은 배심원의 판단을 받아보고 싶다는 입장"이라고 말했다.반면 피해자의 변호인은 "국민참여재판을 받을 권리 못지않게 성폭력 사건의 경우 피해자의 의사도 존중해야 한다"며 "국민참여재판 여부를 신중하게 판단해달라"고 했다.재판부는 "피해자 측에서 이야기했듯이 국민참여재판이 피해자를 완벽하게 보호하지 못하는 구조적인 측면이 있다"면서도 "피고인에게는 본인 일생의 결정이라는 측면도 있어 변호인의 의견을 받아들이며 국민참여재판으로 진행하겠다"고 결론지었다.11월 27일 재판 첫날에는 인정신문과 검찰이 공소사실 요지를 밝히는 모두진술, 폐쇄회로(CC)TV 영상 및 녹음 재생 등 서증조사를 진행하고, 피고인 측이 신청한 증인 5명에 대한 신문도 이어갈 예정이다.재판 둘째 날인 30일에는 피해자에 대한 증인신문, 피고인신문, 검찰 구형과 피고인 측 최종변론을 거쳐 남씨에 대한 선고가 이뤄진다.재판부는 국민참여재판에서는 배심원을 어떻게 설득하는지가 중요한 만큼 양측에 충분한 변론 자율성을 보장할 방침이다.남씨는 지난해 12월 서울 서초구 모처에서 자신의 제자인 여성을 사회적 지위 등을 이용해 성폭행한 혐의를 받고 있다. 남씨 측은 검찰 수사 과정에서 형사조정 절차 회부를 요청해 피해자와 합의를 시도했지만 피해자가 거부하면서 성사되지 않았다.홍익대학교는 지난 3월 공연예술학부 부교수인 남씨를 직위 해제했다.。
Current article:http://lyupqv.cuozubeishenjingli.cfd/8q4k6/nsxrgw2.html
Published on:12:28:10